WhenRed Dead Redemption 2’s protagonist was announced, many fans quickly guessed that as in the firstRed Deadthe player character would not survive to the end of the story. Arthur Morgan is nowhere to be found in the first game; he isn’t even mentioned. Few fans, however, could have guessed how Arthur would meet his end.
At the end of Chapter 5 ofRed Dead Redemption 2, a doctor tells Arthur in no uncertain terms that he has contracted Tuberculosis and is terminally ill. It’s one of the defining moments of the prequel, and one of the most memorable moments in a series packed full of beautiful vistas, bizarre characters, and hilarious Easter eggs. Arthur’s death is so important, but many may wonder what could have changed if Arthur had never contracted his illness.
RELATED:Red Dead Redemption 2: Every Treasure Map & Where To Find Them
Arthur’s Diagnosis
Red Dead Redemptionis a series about decline. The Van Der Linde gang are in the Wild West outlaw business too late, which is is already obvious in the first game. Set in 1911, John Marston’s life as a frontier gunslinger is nearly anachronistic as the world approaches WW1. Over the course of the first game, John is forced to hunt down formerVan Der Linde gang membersin order to save his own family.
In the end, however, John is shot to death by agents of the very government he thought he was working for. The message is clear. The frontier is closed, the days of outlaws are done, and the federal government’s iron grip now extends throughout the United States. John’s death is just a matter of tying up loose ends. Even when John’s son Jack takes revenge for his father’s death, there is no “redemption” for the gun-slinging lifestyle. Instead, it is implied that killing a government agent in 1914 has likely doomedJack Marstonto his father’s fate.
If John’s sudden death shows a man being caught unaware by changing times, Arthur’s slow agonizing decline reflects those changing times directly. John always believes he’s going to make it out, and has more than a few lucky escapes across both games.Arthur Morgandoesn’t get to indulge in the same fantasy, even if both men are ultimately doomed.
When the player leaves the doctor’s office after Arthur’s diagnosis, the world is in a washed-out sepia tone, as if already part of an old, fading photograph. The present already appears to be a part of the past, as if Arthur is already dead. From then on, players can choose whether or not Arthur’s final weeks are spent doing good or falling back to his old ways. While this has implications for Arthur’s personality, it has no effect on the fate of theVan Der Linde gang.
The changes are all arbitrary. Alow honor Arthurwill be shot by Micah, while a high honor Arthur will succumb to his disease and injuries when the sun comes up. A low honor Arthur will see a coyote in his final moments, a high honor Arthur will see a stag. The symbolism changes, but the outcomes don’t.
RELATED:A Red Dead Redemption 3 Would Benefit a Lot From a RDR1 Remake
A Change In Perspective
The philosophy ofRed Dead Redemptionleads to an almost unavoidable conclusion about Arthur’s fate. Like different animals and the sepia tone that filters the screen after Arthur’s diagnosis, being told he is going to die only changes Arthur’s perspective, not his destination. As the Sister says to ahigh honor Arthurduring a painful conversation about his illness, “be grateful that for the first time you see your life clearly.”
This works on a few levels. Even within the game’s time period, it’s clear that the Van Der Linde gang has been in decline for some time, and the the idea and lifestyle of the Old West itself is dying. Arthur didn’t need a diagnosis to tell him that he was going to die; even if he somehow escaped being shot or hanged, his death is an inevitability. Ultimately, the game suggests that Arthur was doomed even if he had never contracted Tuberculosis. AsDutch Van Der Lindesays, “we can’t fight change. We can’t fight gravity. We can’t fight nothing.”
What Arthur’s Diagnosis Changes
To say that Arthur’s diagnosis changes nothing, however, is to undermine the huge role his perspective shift plays in differentiating the second game from the first.John Marstonnever gets the perspective Arthur gains; his belief suckers him in until the very end.
John’s death is in part a tribute to the final scene ofButch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, when the titular characters burst out of a barn to face an squadron of soldiers waiting for them. Even the movie, however, pauses right before their seemingly unavoidable fates are unambiguously confirmed, leaving the fantastical possibility of their survival.Red Deadpulls no such punches, and John doesn’t get a movie ending. He’s filled full of bullets before his bloody corpse drops to the ground.
For Arthur, knowing about his certain death in advance gives him the opportunity to reflect upon his life honestly. The first mission after Arthur’s death is titled “The Wheel.” This is a reference to the idea of the Wheel of Fortune, a metaphor used in Thomas Malory’sLe Morte D’Arthurfor the good and bad heroes ofArthurian mythologyare fated to do in their lives before they meet their maker.
Whether Arthur sees a stag, a coyote, or the barrel ofMicah Bell’s gun at the end of his journey inRed Dead Redemption2, Arthur is able to see an honest, holistic symbol of the life he’s led. It doesn’t change the fact that he’s going to die, but it gives Arthur brief access to a truer understanding of his life than John ever had. Arthur Morgan’s diagnosis may not have changed the ultimate outcome ofRed Dead Redemption 2’s plot, but the series would be far poorer without it.
Red Dead Redemption 2is available now on PC, PS4, Stadia, and Xbox One.
MORE:Red Dead Redemption 2: A Complete Guide To The Horseman Challenges
